On 2/11/25 9:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I say "of course" but few people (even tech ones) know the distinction.
>> (Nor should they have to! But that's for a nearby thread). This patch aims
>> to prevent this very bad footgun by only allowing a /0 if the IP consists
>> of only zeroes. It works for ipv4 and ipv6.
>
> More generally, should we reject if the netmask causes *any* nonzero
> IP bits to be ignored? Our CIDR type already imposes that rule:
+1 From me too. I think we should fix the general issue rather than
special casing /0.
Andreas