| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join |
| Date: | 2018-02-16 15:39:40 |
| Message-ID: | a86b7fa3-6764-9b06-076c-01fd7d9e99e9@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/14/18 03:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of
>>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I
>>> would write it enable_partitionwise_join.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql
>
> To that I replied with
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcsZnxCen88a-16R5EYqPCwFYnFThM%2Bmjagu%3DB1QvxPVA%40mail.gmail.com.
> I didn't get any further response, so nothing was changed that time.
> Alvaro, Peter, Gavin have voted for partitionwise in this thread and
> Robert had similar objections earlier. Looks like we should change it.
done
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julian Markwort | 2018-02-16 15:45:28 | [PATCH] pg_hba.conf : new auth option : clientcert=verify-full |
| Previous Message | Steven Lembark | 2018-02-16 15:13:57 | Re: pearltidy source code has been removed (pgindent) |