| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity |
| Date: | 2017-08-31 20:02:20 |
| Message-ID: | a4bdef86-0042-81ec-db68-c54f3ef43a8b@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The process names shown in pg_stat_activity.backend_type as of PG10 and
the process names used in the ps display are in some cases gratuitously
different, so here is a patch to make them more alike. Of course it
could be debated in some cases which spelling was better.
As an aside, is there a reason why the archiver process is not included
in pg_stat_activity?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Sync-process-names-between-ps-and-pg_stat_activity.patch | text/plain | 6.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-31 20:04:45 | Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-31 19:51:20 | Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order |