Re: Subscription code improvements

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Subscription code improvements
Date: 2017-08-07 13:22:20
Message-ID: a41d2469-c46f-e574-b2ff-7feb943dc8bd@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/7/17 00:27, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> However, even with this patch there is still an issue that NOTICE
>>> messages "removed subscription for table public.t1" can be appeared
>>> even if we rollback ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH command as I mentioned
>>> on earlier thread. Since I think this behaviour will confuse users who
>>> check server logs I'd like to deal with it, I don't have a good idea
>>> though.
>>
>> Maybe we can just remove those messages?
>>
>> We don't get messages when we create a subscription about which tables
>> are part of it. So why do we need such messages when we refresh a
>> subscription?
>
> I think that the messages is useful when we add/remove tables to/from
> the publication and then refresh the subscription, so we might want to
> change it to DEBUG rather than elimination.

Good idea. Done that way.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-08-07 13:37:30 Re: Adding hook in BufferSync for backup purposes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-07 13:21:50 Re: Subscription code improvements