Re: Testlib.pm vs msys

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Testlib.pm vs msys
Date: 2017-07-26 13:42:24
Message-ID: a2b0e4ce-3a82-f197-1578-4f4d475e00e9@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/26/2017 09:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>
>> The latter fact makes me
>> theorize that the problem arises from the fairly ancient perl that Msys
>> provides, and which we need to use to run prove so the TAP tests
>> understand the environment's virtualized file paths.
> It might be interesting to look into its copy of IPC::Run and see if
> the wait technology is different from later versions.

It's using 0.94 just like my Linux box.

>
>> The attached patch should get around the problem without upsetting the
>> good work you've been doing in reducing TAP test times generally.
> I still find this pretty ugly :-(.
>
>

I'm open to alternative suggestions. But I don't want to spend a heck of
a lot of time on this.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-07-26 13:52:21 Re: HACKERS[PATCH] split ProcArrayLock into multiple parts
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-07-26 13:39:39 Re: Update comments in nodeModifyTable.c