Re: Testlib.pm vs msys

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Testlib.pm vs msys
Date: 2017-07-26 15:12:53
Message-ID: 7398.1501081973@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 07/26/2017 09:33 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It might be interesting to look into its copy of IPC::Run and see if
>> the wait technology is different from later versions.

> It's using 0.94 just like my Linux box.

Oh well, I hoped maybe we could update that.

>> I still find this pretty ugly :-(.

> I'm open to alternative suggestions. But I don't want to spend a heck of
> a lot of time on this.

Well, let's at least do the temp files a little more safely.
Maybe like this?

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
msys-tap-hang-fix-2.patch text/x-diff 2.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shubham Barai 2017-07-26 15:20:52 GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8)
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2017-07-26 15:11:42 Re: UPDATE of partition key