Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: "a(dot)rybakina" <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Date: 2023-09-20 09:37:05
Message-ID: a2941c7a-df4f-c4f3-bca2-2fcc450980f7@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29.08.23 05:37, a.rybakina wrote:
> Thank you for your interest in this problem and help, and I'm sorry that
> I didn't respond to this email for a long time. To be honest, I wanted
> to investigate the problems in more detail and already answer more
> clearly, but unfortunately I have not found anything more significant yet.

What is the status of this patch? It is registered in the commitfest.
It looks like a stalled research project? The last posted patch doesn't
contain any description or tests, so it doesn't look very ready.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kuwamura Masaki 2023-09-20 09:46:32 Re: bug fix and documentation improvement about vacuumdb
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-09-20 09:24:08 Re: There should be a way to use the force flag when restoring databases