Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Koen De Groote <kdg(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization
Date: 2024-11-21 22:15:02
Message-ID: Zz-w5u1XZjsOJoXN@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 06:52:34PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 09:07:38AM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 2:16 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 11:48:16PM +0200, Koen De Groote wrote:
> > > > Number 2 would be perfect, I think. It leaves no doubt at all.
> > >
> > > I went with even more direct wording, patch attached. Glad we could
> > > improve this together --- the feedback from everyone was helpful.
> > >
> >
> > One small nit -- I think "PostgreSQL" typically would have SGML markup:
> >
> > <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
>
> Yes, I thought so too, but if you look at the SGML, it uses PostgreSQL
> with no markup in many places close to this sentence, e.g. "PostgreSQL
> supports both mechanisms concurrently".

Patch applied to master. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Koen De Groote 2024-11-22 10:42:01 Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization
Previous Message Erik Wienhold 2024-11-21 15:31:07 Re: Misprints in code