Re: Logical replication - initial data synchronization

Thanks for letting us know, will be happy to see it appear.

Regards,
Koen De Groote

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:15 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 06:52:34PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 09:07:38AM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 2:16 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 11:48:16PM +0200, Koen De Groote wrote:
> > > > > Number 2 would be perfect, I think. It leaves no doubt at all.
> > > >
> > > > I went with even more direct wording, patch attached. Glad we could
> > > > improve this together --- the feedback from everyone was helpful.
> > > >
> > >
> > > One small nit -- I think "PostgreSQL" typically would have SGML markup:
> > >
> > > <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>
> >
> > Yes, I thought so too, but if you look at the SGML, it uses PostgreSQL
> > with no markup in many places close to this sentence, e.g. "PostgreSQL
> > supports both mechanisms concurrently".
>
> Patch applied to master. :-)
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
> EDB https://enterprisedb.com
>
> When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
> "Am I going to die soon?"
>