Re: Relation bulk write facility

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Relation bulk write facility
Date: 2024-02-26 04:18:51
Message-ID: ZdwRK-bqyRt4khc6@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 09:42:03AM +0530, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 1:21 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So, we now need to strip the remnants of AIX support from the code and
>> docs? I don't see that much of it, but it's misleading to leave it
>> there.
>>
>> (BTW, I still want to nuke the remaining snippets of HPPA support.
>> I don't think it does anybody any good to make it look like that's
>> still expected to work.)
>
> +1 for removing things that don't work (or that we think probably don't work).

Seeing this stuff eat developer time because of the debugging of weird
issues while having a very limited impact for end-users is sad, so +1
for a cleanup of any remnants if this disappears.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-02-26 04:21:40 Re: Preserve subscription OIDs during pg_upgrade
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-02-26 04:12:03 Re: Relation bulk write facility