Re: Fix incorrect PG_GETARG in pgcrypto

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix incorrect PG_GETARG in pgcrypto
Date: 2024-02-27 02:51:23
Message-ID: Zd1OK6bf533KNRr7@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:47:27PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Should this be marked as committed, or is there some remaining part?

Thanks. I've missed the existence of [1]. It is now marked as
committed.

[1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4822/
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2024-02-27 03:01:37 Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-02-27 02:46:13 Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes