| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nishant Sharma <nishant(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Code Cleanup] : Small code cleanup in twophase.sql |
| Date: | 2023-10-10 06:04:14 |
| Message-ID: | ZSTpXqGUmEcp77mR@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 06:31:42PM +0530, Nishant Sharma wrote:
> To support it I have below points:-
>
> 1) Grepping this table 'test_prepared_savepoint' shows occurrences
> only in twophase.out & twophase.sql files. This means that table is
> local to that sql test file and not used in any other test file.
>
> 2) I don't see any comment on why this was not added in the cleanup
> section of twophase.sql, but drop for other two test tables are done.
>
> 3) I ran "make check-world" with the patch and I don't see any failures.
Note that sometimes tables are left around in the regression tests for
pg_upgrade, so as we can test dedicated upgrade paths for some object
types. But, here, I think you're right: this is not a table that
matters for an upgrade and the end of the test file also expects a
cleanup. So okay for me to drop this table here.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2023-10-10 06:10:46 | Re: PGDOCS - add more links in the pub/sub reference pages |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-10-10 05:59:32 | Re: Minor edit to src/bin/pg_upgrade/IMPLEMENTAION |