Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Add a new BGWORKER_BYPASS_ROLELOGINCHECK flag
Date: 2023-10-10 04:36:01
Message-ID: ZSTUsZIskXmxZUg_@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 11:11:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> Saying that, I'm OK with just dropping this query, as it could also be
>> possible that one decides that calling pgstat_bestart() before the
>> datallowconn check is a good idea for a reason or another.
>
> Not sure if that's a likely change or not. However, if we're in
> agreement that this test step isn't buying much, let's just drop
> it and save the test cycles.

No problem here. f483b2090 has removed the query entirely, relying
now only on a wait_for_log() when the worker startup fails.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2023-10-10 04:48:17 Re: Crash in add_paths_to_append_rel
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-10-10 04:34:32 Re: Add support for AT LOCAL