Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"

From: "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com" <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby"
Date: 2022-03-11 06:24:15
Message-ID: ZR0P278MB0920A8E3651BA035BB88264DD20C9@ZR0P278MB0920.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>Looks the same as v5 for me, that applies the same consistency rules
>everywhere in the docs.  So applied this one.

Thank you, Michael

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-03-11 06:30:30 Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2022-03-11 06:22:44 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints