Re: Bug fix in vacuumdb --buffer-usage-limit xxx -Z

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ryoga Yoshida <bt23yoshidar(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug fix in vacuumdb --buffer-usage-limit xxx -Z
Date: 2023-09-21 05:59:25
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 05:50:26PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> I've pushed your patch plus some additional code to escape the text
> specified in --buffer-usage-limit before passing it to the server in
> commit 5cfba1ad6

That was fast. If I may ask, why don't you have some regression tests
for the two code paths of vacuumdb that append this option to the
commands generated for VACUUM and ANALYZE?

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-09-21 06:07:39 Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-09-21 05:57:43 Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication