Re: Using defines for protocol characters

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Date: 2023-08-15 21:37:18
Message-ID: ZNvwDsy2lfGXoUUc@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 06:25:09AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Currently pqcomm.h needs c.h which is not problem for Pgpool-II. But
> what about other middleware?

Why do you need to include directly c.h? There are definitions in
there that are not intended to be exposed.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-08-15 21:40:07 Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2023-08-15 21:25:09 Re: Using defines for protocol characters