Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date: 2023-05-21 01:33:44
Message-ID: ZGl0+HV4HzEkVuTw@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 07:58:34AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 09:42:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> writes:
> >> I would also prefer a GUC named gss_accept_delegation, but the current
> >> name matches the libpq gssdeleg connection parameter and the PGSSDELEG
> >> environment variable. Maybe there's something to be said for keeping
> >> those three things alike?
> >
> > +1 for spelling it out in all user-visible names. I do not think
> > that that GSS-API C symbol is a good precedent to follow.
>
> +1

With less then 48 hours to beta 1 packaging, I have made this change and
adjusted internal variable to match.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2023-05-21 01:42:55 Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-05-21 00:57:47 Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready