Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date: 2023-05-19 14:58:34
Message-ID: 20230519145834.GA3369022@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 09:42:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> writes:
>> I would also prefer a GUC named gss_accept_delegation, but the current
>> name matches the libpq gssdeleg connection parameter and the PGSSDELEG
>> environment variable. Maybe there's something to be said for keeping
>> those three things alike?
>
> +1 for spelling it out in all user-visible names. I do not think
> that that GSS-API C symbol is a good precedent to follow.

+1

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-05-19 14:59:47 Re: Conflict between regression tests namespace & transactions due to recent changes
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-05-19 14:57:02 Re: PostgreSQL 16 Beta 1 release announcement draft