| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Orphaned wait event |
| Date: | 2023-04-25 21:34:13 |
| Message-ID: | ZEhHVYXZloUqH4W0@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 09:24:58PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> It looks like this patch attached upthread at [1] isn't in yet,
> meaning WAIT_EVENT_SLRU_FLUSH_SYNC stays unused. IMO, it's worth
> pushing it to the PG16 branch. It will help add a wait event for SLRU
> page flushes. Thoughts?
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKG%2BewEpxm%3DhPNXyupRUB_SKGh-6tO86viaco0g-P_pm_Cw%40mail.gmail.com
There could be the argument that some external code could abuse of
this value for its own needs, but I don't really buy that. I'll go
clean up that..
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-04-25 21:39:21 | Re: Allow pg_archivecleanup to remove backup history files |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-04-25 20:00:24 | Re: pg_stat_io for the startup process |