| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com, john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages |
| Date: | 2023-04-11 06:17:46 |
| Message-ID: | ZDT7ioY5oNPoTpHA@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 05:25:46PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Wouldn't storing the value in the shared memory itself work? Though,
> that space does become almost dead for the server's lifetime...
Sure, it would work. However, we'd still need an interface for the
extra function. At this point, a GUC with an unknown state is kind of
OK for me. Anyway, where would you stick this state?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-04-11 06:36:12 | Re: cfbot is listing committed patches? |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2023-04-11 06:15:42 | cfbot is listing committed patches? |