Re: Missing rules for queryjumblefuncs.{funcs,switch}.c for maintainer-clean

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Missing rules for queryjumblefuncs.{funcs,switch}.c for maintainer-clean
Date: 2023-03-20 07:46:08
Message-ID: ZBgPQEHLV+PRL7mC@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:18:17PM +0800, Richard Guo wrote:
> A minor comment for the README is that now we have five support
> functions not four.
>
> - outcome. (For some classes of node types, you don't need all four support
> + outcome. (For some classes of node types, you don't need all five support

Right, missed that. How about removing the "fout/five" entirely here
and make that simpler? I would propose:
"For some classes of node types, you don't need all the support
functions."
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-03-20 07:49:25 Re: Missing rules for queryjumblefuncs.{funcs,switch}.c for maintainer-clean
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-03-20 07:32:15 Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication