Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count
Date: 2023-03-15 01:24:54
Message-ID: ZBEeZqUqKmwYeV32@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:19:28AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I hesitated to propose such a level of simplification, but basically I
> was alsothinking the same thing.

Okay, fine by me to use one single message. I'd rather still keep the
three tests, though, as they check the three conditions upon which the
error would be triggered.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-03-15 01:50:15 Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-03-15 01:19:28 Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count