Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count

From: Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: psql \watch 2nd argument: iteration count
Date: 2023-03-15 03:20:23
Message-ID: CAAhFRxgYvgZ-PNWoLtW-E=9cBLhMVDfdNeOtiSb5YvEZ6xntXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:25 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:19:28AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > I hesitated to propose such a level of simplification, but basically I
> > was alsothinking the same thing.
+1

> Okay, fine by me to use one single message. I'd rather still keep the
> three tests, though, as they check the three conditions upon which the
> error would be triggered.

PFA v8. Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Fix-incorrect-argument-handling-in-psql-watch.patch application/octet-stream 2.3 KB
v8-0002-Add-iteration-count-argument-to-psql-watch-comman.patch application/octet-stream 8.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-03-15 03:42:20 Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-03-15 02:32:06 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum