Re: public schema grants to PUBLIC role

From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt(at)burggraben(dot)net>
To: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: public schema grants to PUBLIC role
Date: 2023-03-09 11:35:11
Message-ID: ZAnEb0jn09gISJaU@squirrel.exwg.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

## Dominique Devienne (ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com):

> Hi. I've recently realized via a post (or article?) from Laurenz that the
> PUBLIC role has CREATE privilege on the 'public' schema by default (see
> query below). I guess it can't be avoided?

You could just use PostgreSQL 15:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/release-15.html#id-1.11.6.7.4

> In particular, we need extensions, which are loaded in public by default.
> Will USAGE of public be enough for LOGIN users having access to the DB to
> use extensions?

Plus any grants on the extension's object.

> More broadly, we want to secure the DB so that all DB access and schema
> access are explicit.
> Anything else to be aware of please, beside the two mentioned above?

Have a look at default privileges and group roles, that will make your
life much easier.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/ddl-priv.html

Regards,
Christoph

--
Spare Space.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Clarke 2023-03-09 12:14:30 RE: Blog post series on commitfests and patches
Previous Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2023-03-09 09:58:52 RE: Support logical replication of DDLs