Re: Normalization of utility queries in pg_stat_statements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Normalization of utility queries in pg_stat_statements
Date: 2023-03-03 00:37:27
Message-ID: ZAFBR1cwIq39ywX+@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 08:12:24AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Applying 0001 produces:
>
> Applying: Split more regression tests of pg_stat_statements
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:1735: new blank line at EOF.
> +
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:2264: new blank line at EOF.
> +
> warning: 2 lines add whitespace errors.

Indeed, removed.

> What about removing those comments?

Removing these two as well.

> Except from the Nits above, 0001 LGTM.

Thanks for double-checking, applied 0001 to finish this part of the
work. I am attaching the remaining bits as of the attached, combined
into a single patch. I am going to look at it again at the beginning
of next week and potentially apply it so as the normalization reflects
to the reports of pg_stat_statements.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0003-Remove-normalization-of-A_Const-nodes.patch text/x-diff 10.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-03-03 00:37:32 Re: Rework LogicalOutputPluginWriterUpdateProgress
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-03-03 00:32:33 Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format