Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
Date: 2024-12-03 01:09:44
Message-ID: Z05aWBxDi5UER7p4@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 09:14:11AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 2:53 AM Anthonin Bonnefoy
> <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> wrote:
>> Sorry about that. I didn't have a strong need for this to be
>> backpatched and should have made this clearer.
>
> FWIW, I don't think you did anything wrong. To me, the thread reads
> like you just submitted this as a normal patch and Michael decided to
> back-patch.

Yep, this one's on me. Please don't worry, Anthonin.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-03 01:16:35 Re: code contributions for 2024, WIP version
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-12-03 01:05:42 Re: meson missing test dependencies