Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Consider pipeline implicit transaction as a transaction block
Date: 2024-12-02 14:14:11
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa7VxEQyCNVtB5c8FmVhqYWkqQ=swAY6Dyn0Yb-Nfefvw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 2:53 AM Anthonin Bonnefoy
<anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 12:26 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > I don't mind being more careful here based on your concerns, so I'll
> > go remove that in the stable branches.
>
> Sorry about that. I didn't have a strong need for this to be
> backpatched and should have made this clearer.

FWIW, I don't think you did anything wrong. To me, the thread reads
like you just submitted this as a normal patch and Michael decided to
back-patch.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2024-12-02 14:25:33 Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.
Previous Message Victor Yegorov 2024-12-02 14:03:55 Re: Make tuple deformation faster