Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Date: 2022-09-02 08:00:47
Message-ID: YxG4LwblKJtpyCEG@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 09:51:26AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Fine by me if both you and Daniel want to be more careful with this
> change. We could always argue about a backpatch later if there is
> more ask for it, as well.

Daniel, are you planning to apply this one on HEAD?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-09-02 08:01:31 Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-09-02 07:30:21 Re: Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be allocated to backends.