| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM |
| Date: | 2022-08-26 00:51:26 |
| Message-ID: | YwgZDna+jiIN9fY/@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:45:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I'm leaning towards considering it a feature-change and thus not
> something to backpatch (I'd be OK sneaking it into 15 though, as that
> one is not released yet and it feels like a perfectly *safe* change).
> Not enough to insist on it, but it seems "slightly more correct".
Fine by me if both you and Daniel want to be more careful with this
change. We could always argue about a backpatch later if there is
more ask for it, as well.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-08-26 01:02:26 | Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation |
| Previous Message | Yuya Watari | 2022-08-26 00:39:32 | Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions |