Re: SQL/JSON features for v15

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
Date: 2022-08-23 04:13:07
Message-ID: YwRT07h1UPT1Qtfs@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 07:57:29PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> To me it feels like there's a probably too much work here to cram it at this
> point. If several other committers shared the load of working on this it'd
> perhaps be doable, but I've not seen many volunteers.

While 0002 is dead simple, I am worried about the complexity created
by 0001, 0003 (particularly tightening subtransactions with a
CASE_EEOP) and 0004 at this late stage of the release process:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7d83684b-7932-9f29-400b-0beedfafcdd4@postgrespro.ru

This is not a good sign after three betas for a feature as complex as
this one.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-08-23 04:16:31 Re: ICU for global collation
Previous Message Peter Smith 2022-08-23 04:01:52 Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply