Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Date: 2022-08-23 00:15:01
Message-ID: YwQcBdH6s8/MF3EC@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 04:05:16PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Do you mean it can, or can not be backpatched? (I'd argue for
> backpatching since the behaviour is slightly broken at the moment.)

I mean that it is fine to backpatch that, in my opinion.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2022-08-23 01:16:59 Re: shadow variables - pg15 edition
Previous Message Peter Smith 2022-08-23 00:13:35 fix typo - empty statement ;;