Re: shadow variables - pg15 edition

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: shadow variables - pg15 edition
Date: 2022-08-23 01:16:59
Message-ID: 20220823011659.GF2342@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 09:17:41PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 16:28, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> > Let me know what I can do when it's time for round two.
>
> I pushed the modified 0001-0008 patches earlier today and also the one
> I wrote to fixup the 36 warnings about "expected" being shadowed.

Thank you

> I looked through a bunch of your remaining patches and was a bit
> unexcited to see many more renaming such as:

Yes - after Michael said that was the sane procedure, I had rearranged the
patch series to present eariler those patches first which renamed variables ..

> However, one category of these changes that I do like are the ones
> where we can move the variable into an inner scope.

There are a lot of these, which ISTM is a good thing.
This fixes about half of the remaining warnings.

https://github.com/justinpryzby/postgres/tree/avoid-shadow-vars
You could review without applying the patches, on the webpage or (probably
better) by adding as a git remote. Attached is a squished version.

--
Justin

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2.txt text/plain 37.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2022-08-23 01:17:10 Re: Change pfree to accept NULL argument
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-08-23 00:15:01 Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM