Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: First draft of the PG 15 release notes
Date: 2022-07-14 15:15:26
Message-ID: YtAzDpzRr+XClgxr@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 01:24:41PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Regarding this item:
>
> "Allow hash lookup for NOT IN clauses with many constants (David Rowley, James
> Coleman)
> Previously the code always sequentially scanned the list of values."
>
> The todo list has an entry titled "Planning large IN lists", which links to 
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1178821226.6034.63.camel@goldbach
>
> Did we already have a hash lookup for IN clauses with constants and the above
> commit adds NOT IN? If so, maybe we have enough to remove this todo item.

Agreed, I have removed it now.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-07-14 15:24:49 Re: EINTR in ftruncate()
Previous Message tushar 2022-07-14 14:53:37 Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option