Re: Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, LEMAIRE Leslie (Chargée de mission) - SG/SNUM/UNI/DRC <leslie(dot)lemaire(at)developpement-durable(dot)gouv(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands
Date: 2022-05-21 03:14:39
Message-ID: YohZH+fjVTuMPHVb@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 05:23:19PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The other option, of course, is to not backpatch any of this earlier
> than 14. But the OP says she was experimenting with version 10
> initially.

Nah. I think that you are right to have done that down to 10 with the
extra test coming from 14~. Thanks for fixing the issue!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-05-21 04:27:08 Re: Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-05-20 19:06:53 Re: BUG #17486: [pg_restore] Restoring a view fails if this view contains an attribute without alias name.