Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, daniel(at)yesql(dot)se, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add --{no-,}bypassrls flags to createuser
Date: 2022-05-25 03:47:56
Message-ID: Yo2m7Oip47raXzfT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:07:52AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> I reproduced the same failure at my hand and identified the
> cause. Windows' version of getopt_long seems to dislike that
> non-optional parameters precedes options.

Tweaking the list of arguments in some commands kicked by the TAP
tests to satisfy our implementation of getopt_long() has been the
origin of a couple of portability fixes, like ffd3980.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-05-25 03:56:26 Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-05-25 03:47:11 Re: HOLD_INTERRUPTS() vs ProcSignalBarrier