Re: Windows now has fdatasync()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows now has fdatasync()
Date: 2022-02-06 06:20:07
Message-ID: Yf9ol5psqDuDv7uD@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 03:48:10PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I tried out a quick POC patch and it runs a bit faster than fsync(), as
> expected.

Good news, as a too high difference would be suspect :)

How much difference does it make in % and are the numbers rather
reproducible? Just wondering..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-06 06:46:19 Re: pg_receivewal - couple of improvements
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-06 06:11:44 Re: pg_upgrade should truncate/remove its logs before running