Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIN32 pg_import_system_collations
Date: 2021-12-15 02:52:12
Message-ID: YblYXOuWyLVHopKD@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:45:28AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Ah, right. I hope we can make the leap to 0x0A00 (Win10) soon and
> just stop thinking about these old ghosts, as mentioned by various
> people in various threads.

Seeing your message here.. My apologies for the short digression.
Would that mean that we could use CreateSymbolicLinkA() as a mapper
for pgreadlink() rather than junction points? I am wondering how much
code in src/port/ such a move could allow us to do.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-12-15 02:53:12 Re: parallel vacuum comments
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-12-15 02:49:11 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side