From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields |
Date: | 2021-11-19 07:58:52 |
Message-ID: | YZdZPPoIRTkgnGzH@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:50:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm not a different vendor, but I do work on different code than you
> do, and I like this. Advanced Server accidentally dodges this problem
> at present by shipping with a different FUNC_MAX_ARGS value, but this
> is much cleaner.
I am pretty sure that Greenplum could benefit from something like
that. As a whole, using a string looks like a good idea for that.
> Would it be reasonable to consider something similar for the control
> file, for the benefit of distributions that are not the same on disk?
Hmm. Wouldn't that cause more harm than actual benefits?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-11-19 08:18:22 | issue in pgfdw_report_error()? |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-11-19 07:54:52 | Re: wait event and archive_command |