Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields
Date: 2021-11-19 10:01:11
Message-ID: 726905c8-4b11-dcfd-c4eb-b84609b2c7de@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19.11.21 08:58, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:50:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I'm not a different vendor, but I do work on different code than you
>> do, and I like this. Advanced Server accidentally dodges this problem
>> at present by shipping with a different FUNC_MAX_ARGS value, but this
>> is much cleaner.
>
> I am pretty sure that Greenplum could benefit from something like
> that. As a whole, using a string looks like a good idea for that.
>
>> Would it be reasonable to consider something similar for the control
>> file, for the benefit of distributions that are not the same on disk?
>
> Hmm. Wouldn't that cause more harm than actual benefits?

The catalog version already serves this purpose.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2021-11-19 10:01:26 Shouldn't postgres_fdw report warning when it gives up getting result from foreign server?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-11-19 09:56:09 Re: Non-superuser subscription owners