Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command
Date: 2021-10-28 01:54:08
Message-ID: YXoCwLYC7ZlYGa1t@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:20:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> ok(!-f $recovery_end_command_file,
> - 'recovery_end_command executed after promotion');
> + 'recovery_end_command not executed yet');
> Indeed :p

While looking at that this morning, I have noticed an extra bug. If
the path of the data folder included a space, the command would have
failed. I have to wonder if we should do something like
cp_history_files, but that did not seem necessary to me once we rely
on each command being executed from the root of the data folder.

Anyway, I am curious to see what the buildfarm thinks about all that,
particularly with Msys, so I have applied the patch. I am keeping an
eye on things, though.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-28 01:55:35 Re: [PATCH] Fix memory corruption in pg_shdepend.c
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-28 01:50:00 pgsql: Add TAP test for archive_cleanup_command and recovery_end_comman