Re: pg_receivewal starting position

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal starting position
Date: 2021-10-01 07:05:18
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:17:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Using READ_REPLICATION_SLOT as the command name is fine, and it could
> be extended with more fields if necessary, implemented now with only
> what we think is useful. Returning errors on cases that are still not
> supported yet is fine, say for logical slots if we decide to reject
> the case for now, and testrictions can always be lifted in the
> future.

And marked as RwF as this was three weeks ago. Please feel free to
register a new entry if this is being worked on.

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florin Irion 2021-10-01 07:07:01 Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-01 07:03:09 Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction