| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_receivewal starting position |
| Date: | 2021-10-01 07:05:18 |
| Message-ID: | YVazLmDArFT6m9lP@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:17:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Using READ_REPLICATION_SLOT as the command name is fine, and it could
> be extended with more fields if necessary, implemented now with only
> what we think is useful. Returning errors on cases that are still not
> supported yet is fine, say for logical slots if we decide to reject
> the case for now, and testrictions can always be lifted in the
> future.
And marked as RwF as this was three weeks ago. Please feel free to
register a new entry if this is being worked on.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florin Irion | 2021-10-01 07:07:01 | Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-10-01 07:03:09 | Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction |