From: | Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg_receivewal starting position |
Date: | 2021-10-19 15:32:55 |
Message-ID: | 2276953.NG923GbCHz@aivenronan |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
Following recommendations, I stripped most of the features from the patch. For
now we support only physical replication slots, and only provide the two fields
of interest (restart_lsn, restart_tli) in addition to the slot type (fixed at
physical) to not paint ourselves in a corner.
I also removed the part about pg_basebackup since other fixes have been
proposed for that case.
Le vendredi 1 octobre 2021, 09:05:18 CEST Michael Paquier a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:17:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Using READ_REPLICATION_SLOT as the command name is fine, and it could
> > be extended with more fields if necessary, implemented now with only
> > what we think is useful. Returning errors on cases that are still not
> > supported yet is fine, say for logical slots if we decide to reject
> > the case for now, and testrictions can always be lifted in the
> > future.
>
> And marked as RwF as this was three weeks ago. Please feel free to
> register a new entry if this is being worked on.
> --
> Michael
--
Ronan Dunklau
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v6-0001-Add-READ_REPLICATION_SLOT-command.patch | text/x-patch | 12.8 KB |
v6-0003-Add-documentation-for-pg_receivewal.patch | text/x-patch | 1.9 KB |
v6-0002-Use-READ_REPLICATION_SLOT-command-in-pg_receivewa.patch | text/x-patch | 8.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-10-19 15:35:56 | Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing |
Previous Message | Zhihong Yu | 2021-10-19 15:17:34 | Re: UPDATE on Domain Array that is based on a composite key crashes |