From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
Date: | 2021-09-09 04:19:14 |
Message-ID: | YTmLQtpUSK77mlGT@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:52:33PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> Yeah, I did wonder about this. We're even listing it in the "Preset
> Options" section in the docs. I updated this in the new patch set,
> which is attached.
I broke that again, so rebased as v9 attached.
FWIW, I don't have an environment at hand these days to test properly
0001, so this will have to wait a bit. I really like the approach
taken by 0002, and it is independent of the other patch while
extending support for postgres -c to provide the correct runtime
values. So let's wrap this part first. No need to send a reorganized
patch set.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-09-09 04:23:10 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-09-09 01:09:52 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-09-09 04:20:17 | Re: PG Docs - CREATE SUBSCRIPTION option list order |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-09-09 03:58:23 | Re: Add jsonlog log_destination for JSON server logs |