Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Don Seiler <don(at)seiler(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?
Date: 2021-09-09 04:19:14
Message-ID: YTmLQtpUSK77mlGT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:52:33PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> Yeah, I did wonder about this. We're even listing it in the "Preset
> Options" section in the docs. I updated this in the new patch set,
> which is attached.

I broke that again, so rebased as v9 attached.

FWIW, I don't have an environment at hand these days to test properly
0001, so this will have to wait a bit. I really like the approach
taken by 0002, and it is independent of the other patch while
extending support for postgres -c to provide the correct runtime
values. So let's wrap this part first. No need to send a reorganized
patch set.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-09-09 04:23:10 Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-09-09 01:09:52 Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-09-09 04:20:17 Re: PG Docs - CREATE SUBSCRIPTION option list order
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-09-09 03:58:23 Re: Add jsonlog log_destination for JSON server logs