Re: Bracket, brace, parenthesis

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bracket, brace, parenthesis
Date: 2021-05-31 02:36:23
Message-ID: YLRLp3WR7E45woaD@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 03:25:40PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Mmm. Thanks. So the test doesn't a check for the case of trailing
> garbage. Looking the discussion about trailing garbage of integer
> values, we might need one for the case.
>
> The atached second file adds a test for trailing garbage for
> multirangetype.sql and rangetype.sql.

True for the lack of coverage with some junk after the right brace for
multi-ranges, but rangetypes.sql has already some coverage. Applied
with this small update.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-05-31 02:51:13 Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory
Previous Message tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com 2021-05-31 02:34:21 RE: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication