| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? |
| Date: | 2021-05-21 06:32:05 |
| Message-ID: | YKdT5ZM5OInCsDkM@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:24:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> If you switch attcompression, I'd say to go for the others while on
> it. It would not be the first time in history there is a catalog
> version bump between betas.
This is still an open item. FWIW, I can get behind the reordering
proposed by Tom for the consistency gained with pg_type, leading to
the attached to reduce the size of FormData_pg_attribute from 116b to
112b.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg-att-align.patch | text/x-diff | 2.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2021-05-21 06:41:57 | RE: Bug in query rewriter - hasModifyingCTE not getting set |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-05-21 05:56:34 | Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot |