Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories
Date: 2021-04-24 01:50:21
Message-ID: YIN5XQgI4YhPyKLh@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:23:26PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> The patch seems to apply cleanly on v12 but cherry-pick needs help for other
> branches...

FWIW, this did not seem bad enough to me to require a back-patch.
This parameter got introduced in 2016 and this was the only report
related to it for the last 5 years.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-04-24 02:15:43 Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-24 01:47:18 Re: [PATCH] Remove extraneous whitespace in tags: > foo< and >bar <

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-04-24 02:57:35 Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-04-23 18:23:26 Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories