Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories
Date: 2021-04-24 02:57:35
Message-ID: 20210424025734.GP7256@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 10:50:21AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 01:23:26PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > The patch seems to apply cleanly on v12 but cherry-pick needs help for other
> > branches...
>
> FWIW, this did not seem bad enough to me to require a back-patch.
> This parameter got introduced in 2016 and this was the only report
> related to it for the last 5 years.

No, it's not the first report - although I'm surprised I wasn't able to find
more than these.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190102164525.GU25379@telsasoft.com
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f_Qi0iboCos3wu6QiAbdF-9FoK57wxzKbe2-WcesN4rFA%40mail.gmail.com

--
Justin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-24 05:54:54 Re: multi-install PostgresNode fails with older postgres versions
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-04-24 02:56:38 Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Connah 2021-04-24 18:27:08 Does btrfs on Linux have a negative performance impact for PostgreSQL 13?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-24 01:50:21 Re: [PATCH] force_parallel_mode and GUC categories