Re: hba.c:3160:18: warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hba.c:3160:18: warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression
Date: 2021-04-07 12:17:45
Message-ID: YG2i6bzd9hrpAj5S@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> That's very close to mine (see one email later). Let's bikeshed about
> the details. I think it's basically the same for current usecases, but
> that taking the UserAuth as the parameter is cleaner and potentially
> more useful for the future.

Missed it, sorry about that. Using UserAuth as argument is fine by
me. If you wish to apply that, please feel free. I am fine to do
that myself, but that will have to wait until tomorrow my time.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Rijkers 2021-04-07 12:18:13 Re: hba.c:3160:18: warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-04-07 12:15:16 Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions