| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL-standard function body |
| Date: | 2021-04-08 23:01:03 |
| Message-ID: | YG+LLyuymgI4BH2L@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 12:21:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I see that contrib/test_decoding also sets NO_INSTALLCHECK = 1,
> and the reason it gets tested is that the buildfarm script has
> a special module for that. I guess we need to clone that module,
> or maybe better, find a way to generalize it.
>
> There are also some src/test/modules modules that set NO_INSTALLCHECK,
> but apparently those do have coverage (modules-check is the step that
> runs their SQL tests, and then the TAP tests if any get broken out
> as separate buildfarm steps).
FWIW, on Windows any module with NO_INSTALLCHECK does not get tested
as we rely mostly on an installed server to do all the tests and avoid
the performance impact of setting up a new server for each module's
test.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2021-04-08 23:18:09 | Re: weird interaction between asynchronous queries and pg_sleep |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-04-08 22:55:46 | Re: pg_amcheck contrib application |